Why I think Pistorius should not be allowed to compete at the Olympics

Shocking, you say? How could I, an unabashed proponent of human enhancement, be opposed to seeing disabled athlete Oscar Pistorius compete at the Olympic Games?

...

Complete entry

Posted by Stu  on  05/20  at  12:05 AM

I was pretty surprised by this ruling. Distance running seems like an area where a well-designed blade would give a huge advantage. Extremely low weight with good springback and the effort required by the athlete could be made quite low compared with an able-bodied runner. If the prosthetics could be designed to give no advantage I would agree with the ruling, but they are not. I develop composite parts for a living (not for this application), and you can really tailor their properties for a given application.

Posted by damndirtypandas  on  05/20  at  06:12 PM

Trying to avoid the mess that including Pistorius will cause is the wrong strategy for a better future. Given your belief that Pistorius may indeed be the future, it is essential that we include those such as him in high profile athletic events. The Olympics are that event. I would presume that many of those who read your opinions have heard of Thomas Hughes. It is one aspect of Mr. Hughes' ideas about technological momentum have relevance to this issue: The sooner we act to shape technologies the more chance we have to effect their development. Once a new technology has matured and been integrated into a culture it is very difficult to change the way that it is used and the way that people think about that technology. The time is now to shape the way that enhancement technologies are used. That shaping can only happen if rules, laws, and public awareness combine to push the development of technologies in directions that are beneficial to humankind. Without integration into the Olympics, integration that happens not due to years of neglect and an understanding that come too late but through active engagement, the shape of our technological future will be determined by politicians exploiting our fear and the vagaries of market forces. There may be other venues, but none as high profile as the Olympics. The Olympics are not-amateur sports and they are already subject to various forms of enhancement. This is a good chance to have and open discussion about athletics, enhancements, and a future that we help to create rather than merely react to. It may be messy. But sports and politics are always messy. Otherwise, the lament "Ah, if it was only like it was back when...." wouldn't be so commonplace in politics and sports.

Posted by Andy Miah  on  05/21  at  01:04 PM

oh you better believe i've got a comment! coming soon.

---

Add your comment here:

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: