Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
MIT Media Lab’s folding CityCar

‪BMW shows off their semi-autonomous driving system‬

Autonomous Transportation for the Year 2030

Automated Cars: Redux

Russell Blackford: Freedom of Religion

‪Jason Silva on Psychedelic Rapture, Ecstatic Awe‬ and Technology

Must the Rich be Lured into Investing? Who are the Real “Job Creators?”

I Want a God-Like Brain

SENS5 - Collective advantages of Life Extension

Malcolm Gladwell on Income Inequality: We’re Off the Rails


ieet books

Smart Mice, Not-So-Smart People: An Interesting and Amusing Guide to Bioethics
Author
by Arthur Caplan

From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto On the Freedom Of Form
by Martine Rothblatt

Freedom of Religion and the Secular State
by Russell Blackford

The Olympics: The Basics
by Andy Miah and Beatriz Garcia


comments

Intomorrow on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 9, 2012)

hankpellissier on 'I Want a God-Like Brain' (Feb 9, 2012)

Intomorrow on 'We Are All Pirates' (Feb 9, 2012)

CygnusX1 on 'Automated Cars: Redux' (Feb 9, 2012)

Pastor_Alex on 'I Want a God-Like Brain' (Feb 9, 2012)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv


IEET > Rights > Economic > Staff > Fellows > Mike Treder

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (2597) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


The Power Pyramid


Mike Treder
Mike Treder
Responsible Nanotechnology

Posted: Jun 1, 2008

How much power do we truly have in making our ideas matter? My estimate that only about one in a million among us—about six thousand people in the whole world—has enough power to effect change on a global basis.

Last September, I drew up a diagram (below) to illustrate the power disparity, as I saw it, and showed the graphic to several colleagues for their reaction. Almost everyone accepted the basic proposal.

image

In his recently published book Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making, David Rothkopf writes about the world's power elite who "ride on Gulfstreams, set the global agenda, and manage the credit crunch in their spare time," and who "have more in common with each other than their countrymen."


A long article by Rothkopf in the April 14, 2008, issue of Newsweek summarizes his arguments and describes how he defines this 'superclass':

So how does one become a member? As ever, being rich certainly helps. Many superclass members are wealthy, wealthier in relative terms than any elite ever has been. The top 10 percent of all people, for example, now control 85 percent of all wealth on the planet. But wealth is only part of the equation. Power is the other currency of any true elite, and if we want to understand the superclass, we need to look at those who have influence that crosses borders—one of the factors that differentiates them from most of the elites of history, whose influence was predominantly national or even more local in nature.

One can debate who is in and who is out endlessly. . . This is a very fluid ranking. But for the purposes of trying to understand the nature of today's topmost global elite, working with the above criteria, I have ended up with a core group of somewhere between 6,000 and 7,000 people—meaning that each one is "one in a million."

Well, imagine my surprise when I read that. Originally I'd pulled the numbers out of my hat (or anywhere else you'd prefer to name) as little more than an educated guess. But it looks like my intuition was correct, or at least that someone else with access to much more information came to the same basic conclusion.

Again, from the Newsweek article:

Stephen Schwarzman, CEO of Wall Street's Blackstone Group, says, "The world is pretty small. In almost every one of the areas in which I am dealing or in which we at Blackstone are looking at deals, you find it is just 20, 30 or 50 people worldwide who drive the industry or the sector." Numbers tell the same tale. If you take just the people who serve in top management positions or on the boards of the five biggest companies in the world, you'll find they also serve on the boards of an additional 140 other major companies and 22 universities. To Schwarzman, being a member of the superclass means being able to "get to anybody in the world with one phone call."

So, what does this mean? How can those of us in the small green segment of the global pyramid above make an impact on the much tinier red segment at the top? Is there any real hope for that? Or are we just spitting into the wind as we hold forth with our opinions?


Mike Treder is the Managing Director of the IEET, and former Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (2598) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


The way members or the red group stay put is by using the sentiments of the masses, and by adapting to the Zeitgeist and the technological change. They don't define it. They never did.

The way for us to make an impact is by discussing and educating about scenarios - spreading memes. Memes are way more powerful than people, even those with the most ressources at their command.

After all what do we want? We want certain outcomes that fit with our humanist values. We want to stir around existential risks, Nick Bostrom's evil Singleton or falling back into pre-modern society. The way to get there is making people aware of what's at stake.

To my mind a lot of transhumanists have done a great job on that so far.



seems like a good place to also weigh the effect that web 2.0 (mass society's latest vehicle) will have against the elite. Information is becoming freer than ever and information is power. Also, the masses now have the tools for the seeding, coordinating and development of ideas that elites will later be forced to address in terms unfavorable to them.

This leads to an interesting discussion about the future of net neutrality.



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: SimFuture(s)

Previous entry: Of dead race horses and the dead long-ball: Two very different consequences of enhancement in sports

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376