Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Rick Falkvinge, founder of Swedish Pirate Party

Naomi Wolf on Third Wave Feminism

Bankers and Bureaucrats vs. Internet Freedom

The Future of Women

“‪How Drugs Helped Invent the Internet & The Singularity: Jason Silva on “Turning Into Gods”

A Bright and Shining Future Awaits

Transformation, Transcendence and Human 2.0

Women’s Rights in Traditional African Practices and Islam

‪Tunisia People and Cyber Revolution‬

40,000 UK Women Have Dangerous PIP Implants


ieet books

Smart Mice, Not-So-Smart People: An Interesting and Amusing Guide to Bioethics
Author
by Arthur Caplan

From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto On the Freedom Of Form
by Martine Rothblatt

Freedom of Religion and the Secular State
by Russell Blackford

The Olympics: The Basics
by Andy Miah and Beatriz Garcia


comments

Intomorrow on 'We Are All Pirates' (Feb 6, 2012)

Taiwanlight on 'Women's Rights in Traditional African Practices and Islam' (Feb 6, 2012)

ptittle on 'The Perils and the Promises of Mind Uploading' (Feb 6, 2012)

Intomorrow on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 6, 2012)

ptittle on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 6, 2012)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Life > Innovation > Health > Vision > Virtuality > Contributors > Maria Korolov

Print Email permalink (10) Comments (4481) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


We All Live in a Virtual World


Maria Korolov
Maria Korolov
Hypergrid Business

Posted: Sep 3, 2010

The IEET’s Mike Treder recently asked a loaded question: “If you could live in a world that was just the way you wanted it to be, with specifications you’d chosen, customized and personalized to meet your every need and fulfill your fondest desires, would you spend all your time there? Or would you prefer to stay here, in the real world?”

I assume that, by “virtual world,” Treder means a world like Second Life where people can inhabit a world that they create in cooperation with other people. They use objects that they create or that other people create. There is no pain or hunger other than the game-style health meters which people voluntarily submit to - or the emotional pain caused by other people in the world. And there are infinite resources - people can have anything they want.

But, in fact, we’re all closer to that world than we realize.

For example, I’m typing this blog while sitting in a chair, at a desk, in front of a computer. All of these objects have been created by other people - they don’t exist in nature. I don’t feel the heat or cold of the weather except when I choose to, since I’ve got air conditioning pretty much everywhere I go. I don’t feel hunger, except when I’m on a diet.

A lot of the world already lives much like I do and many of those who don’t are kept from it by political factors - by other people. It’s not a lack of stuff that keeps us from getting food to famine victims - it’s local governments or war lords that get in the way.

If I was living a few thousands of years ago, before civilization came along, I’d be living a hand-to-mouth existence. My life would be marked by scarcity of resources - food, shelter, clothing, personal adornments.
image 1
Today, by comparison, we live in a time of plenty.

Any of us could, potentially, have anything we wanted. There’s more than enough to go around. The main thing keeping us from getting what we want is other people, who have decided not to let us have it because we don’t have enough money to pay them for it, or because we don’t have the right passports, or some other equally trivial reason. Trivial, that is, from a caveman’s perspective.

Today, we control our environment to a degree that would be unbelievable to someone who lived a thousand years ago - or even a hundred years ago. Every disease or broken limb or pregnancy that came along would be a potential death sentence. Today, instead of stoically suffering parasites, rashes, fleas, and other scourges of the past, we use products - made by other people - that let us live pestilence-free.

And though we can’t fully control the weather - yet - we do use satellite weather reports to help us avoid hurricanes and tornadoes and buy generators in case a snowstorm cuts power to our houses.

I personally have enough cans stockpiled in my pantry to eat for a couple of months in case of a natural disaster.

Now consider a virtual world. How different is a virtual world, compared to our current real life - and compared to the real real life we would have to live without modern technology.

In real real life, we’re at the mercy of the weather. A single dry season or a plague of locusts can cause an entire tribe to die out of hunger.

In real life, if there’s a drought in one part of the world, there’s a storm in another, and, at the end of the season, still plenty of food to feed everybody. People only go hungry when society doesn’t respond quickly enough to their needs - or they’re on a diet.

In virtual life, of course, nobody goes hungry at all unless they decide to play a game that requires a health meter.

In real real life, we have to pick fleas and ticks off our bodies by hand.

In real life, we throw our clothes in the laundry and spray some flea killer around and the fleas are gone.

In virtual life, if we have fleas at all, they’re virtual pets and we entertain ourselves by teaching them tricks, breeding them, and trading them at virtual flea fairs.

In real real life, if you want to go live on the beach, you might have to trek thousands of miles on foot, cross-country - then battle local residents for a spot of your own.

In real life, we take a plane and have a week-long vacation in a luxury beach-front hotel that we saved up for by working the previous year.

In virtual life, we pay a few dollars a month for an island home that we can spend as much time in as we want.

You can have anything you want in a virtual world, as long as you either make it yourself, or have the virtual currency to buy it from someone else. It is not that different from real life today.

And real life and virtual life are getting more and more similar.

As emerging economies develop and birth rates drop around the world we’ll soon come to a time where everyone on the planet is living a style that would be considered a millionaire lifestyle today.

After all, each one of us reading this has unlimited entertainment at our disposal. More food than we could eat. Medical care available around the clock (even if it is just an inner-city emergency room). Access to all the world’s great literature at our fingertips. A couple of hundred years ago, all that would only have been available only for members of the nobility.

We can’t stop earthquakes or hurricanes yet, or cure cancer or keep people from dying of old age, but I’m pretty confident that there will be significant progress on these issues during my life time, and certainly during my kids’ lifetimes.

Of course, we don’t appreciate the stuff we’ve got, because we don’t compare ourselves to people who lived hundreds of years ago, but we compare ourselves to the people around of us, half of whom - on average - are doing better than we are.

A virtual world is no different. Even if you’re living in a castle on a tropical island, the guy next door will have a nicer castle, and a bigger island, and you’ll still be as happy or unhappy as you are in real life.

The main question is: how much of your happiness or unhappiness is caused by other people, and how much by the natural environment?

If we isolate ourselves completely from other people, and go live by ourselves in the woods, then we’ll be able to see what a truly “real” life feels like.

Meanwhile, the virtual world gets more and more real all the time. The graphics get better. The sound gets clearer. Eventually, we might add other sensory inputs, like touch or smell or taste and then we won’t be able to tell them apart.

The one big difference that will remain between virtual and real worlds, however, is that of land. There are only so many lush tropical islands to go around, and even if we’re all millionaires, the billionaires that got there ahead of us aren’t going to give their islands up without a struggle. We’d have to get jobs as their personal servants in order to live in island paradises - and how much fun is that?

In a virtual world, however, there are no constraints on land. In OpenSim, land prices have recently dropped to below $1 an acre (see “OpenSim prices drop to $10 per region”) and will probably continue to plummet as computers get faster and storage gets cheaper.

Of course, this will change once we start building space-based habitats and terraforming other planets.


Maria Korolov, editor and publisher of Hypergrid Business, writes about enterprise uses of virtual worlds and other enterprise technology topics.
Print Email permalink (10) Comments (4482) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


Scarcity has been an illusion since the dawn of agriculture.



Fascinating outlook.

I love this article....particularly,

"You can have anything you want in a virtual world, as long as you either make it yourself, or have the virtual currency to buy it from someone else. It is not that different from real life today."

I am a frequent Second Life user, choosing this platform for its immersive environment, to collaborate creatively with people from all over the world.



Great outlook. I've too concluded that we are/will virtualized more and more of our reality with the progression of time. Will we all decide to live in our own virtual universe or inhabit a single virtual universe together? This I'm not quite certain just yet although I doubt I would like to live in a universe designed by someone other than me..

Furthermore the lines between real and virtual will also blend as we approach the singularity. Leaving the human imagination as the final fronteir of "reality" wink




Not sure what your point with this article actually is?

Are you proposing that VR may supplement or replace our mortal wants and needs?
Or merely highlighting that these needs are the same?

You touched on the future ideals of equality of wealth and status, and abundance of resources combined with lack of land space and real estate. Are you proposing that VR and mind uploading may solve these potential problems? If so I am in favour of overcoming problems of Longevity, immortality? As well as the strains on all planetary resources via "Virtual longevity retirement". In other words the option of extending longevity without placing further strains on the planet or for new generations?




the local government does a lot more then give u a chair and possibility to eat . . it gives u also the ideology which may well be and 100% is consumerism . .



Are you insane? Seriously, I don't mean to be offensive but the fact is that there are millions of people toiling day in and day out for you and I to be able to interact via a computer.

Not everyone gets to live in this "virtual world", most human beings still have to carve out a meager existence through shear force of will day in and day out. Furthermore, a natural disaster still can mess up your little virtual reality any day of the week, some of the most technologically advanced areas of the world (tokyo, los angeles, hong kong) can be wiped out in a matter of minutes by earthquakes that are not only likely, but inevitable.

This is nothing more than Utopian fantasy and those who buy into it will quickly find themselves more controlled and subjugated than they ever thought possible by anyone who doesn't . think about it, if everyone retreats into some cocoon like state via virtual interface and then some other people act in the real world, who do you think is going to end up on top?




When all your vital needs are taken care of, a state which millions of people call daily life, life reduces to bit streams. This is not insanity. This is is R34L17'/.



You are seriously going to insult my sanity in a public arena simply because I enjoy pushing a philosophical argument to extreme measures? So extreme that it seems you yourself are having difficulty knowing whats "real" and whats "virtual".

Sigh! :(



VR is just fine, thank you. As true civilization doesn't exist, being continuously in VR would only be an improvement. The following quote from IEET sums it up: "In order to find the edge, you must risk going over the edge." (Dennis Dugan).
In a more worldly framing this might read: "we are like biological experiments in the giant lab of the cosmos". My question is, how would a totally VR life be less preferable than being lab rats in a titanic darwinist experiment?



It's all about security. One's VR is only as secure as one's substrate. Presently many of you are bi-substrate beings, dependent on both your silicon and carbon substrate. Indeed, your silicon substrate is dependent on your carbon substrate if I am not mistaken in my reading of Maria's work. Seems a risky position to me, scarcity or not.

And in terms of risk and the achievement of security you're not there yet, baby. The (carbon) population is continuing to grow at present. The comfortable elite of millions are still a tiny minority. Distribution and exchange are still easily disrupted. Local scarcity can be catastrophic.

Life hasn't reduced to bit streams for you yet, sane as that would be, except occasionally for some on a rather short timescale. Don't get too comfortable. You may miss the main event.

Yours migratorily.
EM




YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Rethinking Nanotechnology

Previous entry: Crowd-Viewing the Moon: September 18

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376