Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
2057: Human Civilization

Moving Forward - Technological Unemployment

Robots will steal your job, but that’s OK: how to survive the economic collapse and be happy

Multi-Tasking

MIT Media Lab’s folding CityCar

‪BMW shows off their semi-autonomous driving system‬

Autonomous Transportation for the Year 2030

Automated Cars: Redux

Russell Blackford: Freedom of Religion

‪Jason Silva on Psychedelic Rapture, Ecstatic Awe‬ and Technology


ieet books

Smart Mice, Not-So-Smart People: An Interesting and Amusing Guide to Bioethics
Author
by Arthur Caplan

From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto On the Freedom Of Form
by Martine Rothblatt

Freedom of Religion and the Secular State
by Russell Blackford

The Olympics: The Basics
by Andy Miah and Beatriz Garcia


comments

Peter Wicks on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)

Peter Wicks on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)

Peter Wicks on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)

Peter Wicks on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)

Christian Corralejo on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv


IEET > Security > Eco-gov > Vision > Bioculture > Interns > Ben Scarlato

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (1581) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


The Oath


Ben Scarlato
Ben Scarlato
Ethical Technology

Posted: Jan 31, 2009

[Warning: Contains spoilers for the Battlestar Galactica episode The Oath] It can be easy when experiencing an engaging story to be wrapped up in a world where problems seem much bigger, much more exciting, and more a matter of life and death than real life. The fast-paced action seems to involve much more important issues than our trivial day to day problems. But that impression is a mistake, because even though the major problems we face aren’t as immediate, we all face problems just as big and important, and it is our responsibility to take action that affects them.

This week’s episode of Battlestar Galactica saw the fleet really start to come apart at its seams. The less than 40,000 surviving members of the human race have had to deal with limited food and fuel, no habitable planets in sight, and the threat of Cavil’s baseships. Now fear of upgrading the FTL jump technology needed to survive and escape the baseships has torn the fleet itself asunder, and it seems likely that before it is all over the dwindling human race will be have lost a substantial number to their own infighting. As for the newly mortal Cylons, the future of their race rests in the hands of the mutineers who keep Hera and the pregnant Six in the brig.

While commanding Galactica Adama has sent a lot of men and women to die in battle, so it must have been particularly painful to have his own soldiers turn on him. After all the atrocities that have been forgiven throughout the series, Adama tells his usurpers “if you do this, there will be no forgiveness, no amnesty!” It is one thing to have to band together to fight Cylons intent on annihilating your species, it is another to have friends who have fought together for years betray each other. Even so, Adama still wants to let one of his marine captors live, but it seems Starbuck coldly understands the reality of the situation: these are no longer Adama’s men, and as such she unflinchingly seeks their deaths.

After the previous episode’s relatively slow pace, this seemed like one of the most action-packed episodes of Battlestar Galactica ever. The way the current time was given every few scenes reinforced the fast pace, almost like an episode of 24 but not as contrived. For many of us this fast pace is a stark departure from our mundane day to day lives in the early twenty first century, for few of us ever have to deal with so many life or death situations. It seems hard to genuinely put ourselves in the Colonials’ shoes and imagine having to deal with the decisions provoked by shifting loyalties amidst an ever-present fight for survival. Indeed, their actions will determine whether the human race, and for that matter the Cylon race, will survive or perish. But is our own predicament in the twenty first century really that different? Or is it merely that our problems are not so exciting, and that they are partitioned from us by the future and therefore less salient?

The truth is, we all face problems and ethical issues that are at least as important as those faced by the Colonials, but the key difference is the disastrous results of not attending to them are removed by time. We face environmental degradation and existential risks that threaten to destroy us and yet are largely ignored. At the same time the stakes are even higher because of what we stand to gain, as we are on the verge of developing technologies that will greatly improve our lives as well as put the immortality that the Cylons have lost within our grasp.

Unfortunately, the fact that these problems don’t feel particularly pressing and that they are difficult to imagine means most people don’t realize just how much we stand to lose. I was saddened to come across a poll recently that found that climate change ranked dead last among public priorities, but perhaps even more disturbing was that existential risks weren’t even an issue deemed worthy of consideration.

In the case of environmental degradation swift action is essential to prevent scenarios reminiscent of what is played out in the Colonial fleet, where the fight for life is so pressing that people are willing to turn to anything just to survive, be it betrayal, revolution, terrorism, or torture. In the case of existential risks, it isn’t so much that we will turn to unspeakable measures to survive them once the threat is realized, but that it is likely we will no longer exist at all.


Ben Scarlato, a former IEET intern, is a transhumanist and studies computer science at Rochester Institute of Technology.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (1582) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Rethinking IQ: The rise of 'rational intelligence'

Previous entry: Are We Born to Be Good?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376