Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Robots will steal your job, but that’s OK: how to survive the economic collapse and be happy

Multi-Tasking

MIT Media Lab’s folding CityCar

‪BMW shows off their semi-autonomous driving system‬

Autonomous Transportation for the Year 2030

Automated Cars: Redux

Russell Blackford: Freedom of Religion

‪Jason Silva on Psychedelic Rapture, Ecstatic Awe‬ and Technology

Must the Rich be Lured into Investing? Who are the Real “Job Creators?”

I Want a God-Like Brain


ieet books

Smart Mice, Not-So-Smart People: An Interesting and Amusing Guide to Bioethics
Author
by Arthur Caplan

From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto On the Freedom Of Form
by Martine Rothblatt

Freedom of Religion and the Secular State
by Russell Blackford

The Olympics: The Basics
by Andy Miah and Beatriz Garcia


comments

Peter Wicks on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)

Peter Wicks on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)

Peter Wicks on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)

Peter Wicks on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)

Christian Corralejo on 'The Future of Women' (Feb 10, 2012)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv


IEET > Security > SciTech > Life > Innovation > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Staff > Mike Treder

Print Email permalink (8) Comments (1678) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


Awaiting the Sixth Paradigm


Mike Treder
Mike Treder
Ethical Technology

Posted: May 31, 2009

It’s been an interesting few weeks for the announcement of potentially dazzling new online applications, from Microsoft’s search engine Bing, and Google’s collaborative communication tool Wave, to the giant killer of them all, Wolfram Alpha, supposedly the biggest thing since, well, Google.

Of the three, I am the least impressed thus far by Bing. It looks to me like little more than just another search engine, but configured to present results in order of commercial size instead of link popularity. Yawn. I actually hope it is not successful, because it seems to reinforce the hegemony of big corporations over small startups and little guys. And, as this article says, “Yes, Bing is easy. It’s always easy to have someone else choose your values and make your decisions for you. But is that good for society?”

Wave could be quite useful in certain situations, such as project coordination, but I’m not sure it will catch on and become a hugely popular app like Facebook. It’s possible, though, that a generation or two younger than me might enjoy using it in ways that I wouldn’t, so we’ll see. One thing that I found interesting about Wave is that it appears to be a sophisticated version of the ad hoc “virtual workshop” approach that I and others organized a few years ago for developing some nanotechnology scenarios.

And now we get to the big gorilla, Wolfram Alpha, which is, according to one breathless report, “An invention that could change the internet for ever.”

The biggest internet revolution for a generation will be unveiled this month with the launch of software that will understand questions and give specific, tailored answers in a way that the web has never managed before.

The new system, Wolfram Alpha, showcased at Harvard University in the US last week, takes the first step towards what many consider to be the internet’s Holy Grail – a global store of information that understands and responds to ordinary language in the same way a person does.

Although the system is still new, it has already produced massive interest and excitement among technology pundits and internet watchers.

Computer experts believe the new search engine will be an evolutionary leap in the development of the internet.

Maybe. Or maybe not. It is, at the very least, a completely new approach to returning search results. Whether or not it will live up to all the hype and “change the internet for ever” is still to be seen.

In any case, either Wolfram Alpha or something like it will at some point dramatically alter our way of accessing all the vast stores of information that lay mostly fallow on the Internet—fallow in the sense that all of today’s search engines merely bring bits and pieces of information together for us, but they are not yet able to connect them in creative ways that we ourselves would not think of.

Here is something I wrote on this subject back in 2002:

The invention of the World Wide Web (Paradigm V) made it possible for millions of computer users to quickly and easily share data. A single computer can store and retrieve the information contained in thousands of books—but today countless computer networks are interconnected via the Internet and individual humans on every continent enjoy nearly instantaneous access to more information than all of humanity had known in prior centuries.

As computer storage capacity continues to increase explosively, it will soon outstrip our human ability for effective retrieval of information (if this has not happened already). Fortunately, before long we will enjoy the assistance of artificial intelligence (Paradigm VI) that will not only provide access to needed answers, but also will be smart enough to ask questions we could not even formulate. This can be expected to occur within the next 15 to 20 years, if not earlier, and will make available to many humans the knowledge equivalence of at least 100 million books. . .

Reliable storage and easy access to information—no matter how much or how fast—by itself is not enough to power the rapidly approaching technological singularity. Information quality (i.e., accuracy and relevance) and the ability to make creative, innovative, productive use of information are equally significant. But if we assume that tomorrow’s artificial intelligence will be smart enough to quickly and easily sift out quality data, and that the AI also will possess creativity at least the equal of our own, then it seems certain that technological and social change will indeed occur at a pace faster than we can presently imagine.

Seven years ago, I predicted that this big step forward—what I call the Sixth Paradigm—would occur “within the next 15 to 20 years, if not earlier.” That would make it sometime between 2017 and 2022, or possibly before. I’d say Wolfram Alpha looks like a significant but incremental step in that direction, and not yet revolutionary.

What’s still needed is an artificial intelligence that possesses not only speed and power far greater than our own, but also genuine creativity: the ability to find and make new connections between apparently unrelated things and then to judge the value of those new connections and expand upon them as appropriate. Then we will really be on to something.


Mike Treder is the Managing Director of the IEET, and former Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.
Print Email permalink (8) Comments (1679) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


I was very disappointed with Wolfram Alpha.
I wanted to see a chart of life expectancy from 1900 to 2000 (for example). After several failures to be understood I used the pre-made requests, one of which gives live expectancy in France in 1900. Ok, finally. The same for 2000, that works too. Then I try to get one for 1900 AND 2000, but no. The data is there, but I can't get WA to understand me. Don't get me started on natural language.
It acts autistic.

On another, unrelated matter, Mike, it would be interesting if you included in your little chart about paradigms, the date of each of these paradigms. You know, Kurzweil-style, to highlight how exponential it is.



Mike,

Several years ago I concluded that coming up with a good 'knowledge engine' is actually the optimal strategy towards AGI and Singularity. The founders of a good knowledge engine have a good excuse to sit behind a wall of computing power and develop AI related technologies, at the same time raking in tons of cash to fund all the research one desires, and all the while claiming only to be 'developing better search tools' whilst really plotting Singularity :D

As to Wolfram Alpha I was fairly disappointed. I typed in 'Bayes Theorem' and got the result 'Wolfram Alpha doesn't know what to do with your input'. I typed '''ife expectancy male' and got a result. I typed 'Stephen Wolfram' and got a result. But then I typed 'Life expectany of Stephen Wolfram' and got back the all-too familar 'Wolfram Alpha doesn't know what I do with your input'. The designers obviously didn't have a clue about cognitive science. (No ontology, and it can't do cross-domain reasoning). Nice interface though.



Wolfram Alpha: "Labored as if to bring forth an elephant, but delivered a mouse." Not even Paradigm Shift 1.01, let alone 2.0



@mjgeddes: If you click over to the original article I wrote in 2002, you'll see that the chart does include dates. In fact, it's a double exponential -- not only are the Paradigms occurring closer and closer to each other, but with every one the amount of knowledge they make available increases at an exponential pace.



All of these technologies are great but useless without massive users collaborating information.

Youtube change the internet forever. The ability for anyone to broadcast to the world is important.

Shame on you guys for not having a youtube channel. Stop fighting it, even our president realizes the importance of youtube.


Hope to see you there soon.



@ TransAlchemy: thanks for the nudge, we're working on it!

On an unrelated note, check this out -- at least Wolfram Alpha has a sense of humor, if nothing else.



Stephen Wolfram to Answer Wolfram|Alpha Questions in Live Webcast

June 4th

submit your questions now..
http://tinyurl.com/ohkguy

good opportunity to poke into the future development of this tool



Mike,

I was the next poster down wink

Lots of new search/knowledge engines popping up all of a sudden. Suddenly Google has apparently felt an urgent need to crank out a new one. Check out GoogleSquared, it's actually not bad. Let's run two test queries:

Bayes Theorem

and

Transhumanism

Results are presented in a table. Interesting.



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Are Humans Still Evolving?

Previous entry: Evil Genes Part 2

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376