Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
SENS5 - Collective advantages of Life Extension

Malcolm Gladwell on Income Inequality: We’re Off the Rails

Facebook’s Brave New World

Vitology is Life

Rick Falkvinge, founder of Swedish Pirate Party

Naomi Wolf on Third Wave Feminism

Bankers and Bureaucrats vs. Internet Freedom

The Future of Women

“‪How Drugs Helped Invent the Internet & The Singularity: Jason Silva on “Turning Into Gods”

A Bright and Shining Future Awaits


ieet books

Smart Mice, Not-So-Smart People: An Interesting and Amusing Guide to Bioethics
Author
by Arthur Caplan

From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto On the Freedom Of Form
by Martine Rothblatt

Freedom of Religion and the Secular State
by Russell Blackford

The Olympics: The Basics
by Andy Miah and Beatriz Garcia


comments

Intomorrow on 'We Are All Pirates' (Feb 7, 2012)

Intomorrow on 'We Are All Pirates' (Feb 7, 2012)

Intomorrow on 'We Are All Pirates' (Feb 7, 2012)

Peter Wicks on 'The Perils and the Promises of Mind Uploading' (Feb 7, 2012)

CygnusX1 on 'The Perils and the Promises of Mind Uploading' (Feb 7, 2012)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Security > Eco-gov > Military > SciTech > Vision > Futurism > Staff > Mike Treder

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (2774) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


The Next 100 Years


Mike Treder
Mike Treder
Ethical Technology

Posted: Sep 6, 2009

Japan and Turkey form an alliance to attack the United States. Poland becomes America’s closest ally. Mexico makes a bid for global supremacy, and a third world war takes place in space. Sounds strange? It could all happen. . .

It could, at least, according to George Friedman, author of a fascinating speculative look at The Next 100 Years, posted at NewStatesman.



In Friedman’s proposed scenario for the 21st century, he assumes and promotes the dominance of a geopolitical world view:

Geopolitics assumes two things: first, that human beings organise themselves into units larger than families and that they have a natural loyalty to the things they were born into, the people and the places; second, that the character of a nation is determined to a great extent by geography, as is the relationship between nations. We use the term “geography” broadly. It includes the physical characteristics of a location, but it goes beyond that to look at the effects of a place on individuals and communities. These are the foundation of geopolitical forecasting.

Opinion and reputation have little to do with national power. Whether the US president is loathed or admired is of some minor immediate import, but the fundamentals of power are overarching. Nor do passing events have much to do with national power, no matter how significant they appear at that moment. The recent financial crisis mattered, but it did not change the basic geometry of international power. The concept of American decline is casually tossed about, but for America to decline, some other power must surpass it. There are no candidates.

Friedman’s argument is a strong one, building on such prestigious earlier work as Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel, among others. I find it to be a convincing read on the forces shaping world history. However, his outlook for the next 100 years suffers from two significant flaws.

First, he does not account for climate change impacts and related issues such as resource depletion and species losses. And, second, he does not account for transformative emerging technologies (which could prove to be either a boon or a bane).

The factors connected with resources and climate are nicely described in a concise summary from Loz Blain about Four Crucial Resources That May Run Out in Your Lifetime:

We’re living in lucky times. Living standards—in the Western world, at least—are the highest in history. It’s an era of relative peace and plenty that would amaze our ancestors. But it’s not going to continue forever; we’re already stretching many of our natural resources to their limits, and the world’s population will jump from 6.5 billion to around 9 billion over the next 50 years. Get ready for a painful correction—here are four interconnected resources that are headed for a catastrophic squeeze within our lifetime.

Blain identifies looming shortages of oil, food, water, and fish as key challenges for the next half-century and he shows how their declines are interrelated. His sobering conclusion:

This has, of course, been a hugely simplified overview of these four interconnected issues. And there are some potential solutions being developed for each—although each proposed solution seems to come with significant drawbacks and large expenses of its own. The simple fact is that our burgeoning population is already putting the planet’s resources under severe stress, and it’s going to take a number of broad and large-scale breakthroughs to invent our way out of trouble. If we don’t, the next hundred years could look a lot like a reversal of the last hundred.

Any attempt to portray large-scale social and political changes in the 21st century must incorporate the impacts of population growth, peak oil, and global warming, at the very least. Moreover, it’s hard to take seriously a reading of the next nine decades that fails to account for projected developments in biotechnology genetic engineering, robotics, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence. Whether a technological singularity happens or not, rapid progress in these fields—and possibly in others we’re not even aware of yet—is certain to have a significant affect on the future we’ll all inherit.


Mike Treder is the Managing Director of the IEET, and former Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (2775) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


Looking ahead 100 years is just too much for me.
Ninety, http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/3258/ is about all I can handle.

Concerning Jared Diamond: he's pretty good, but an asterisk comes with that:

"Diamond recorded conversations with New Guinea tribespeople and wrote a piece for New Yorker magazine that explained their vengeance culture in evolutionary terms, "to draw an overall lesson about the human need for vengeance." Apparently, his subjects took offense at that characterization. Some of them are not so primitive as he portrayed them; some have good-paying jobs and internet access. Diamond found himself slapped with a lawsuit by a couple of these New Guinea tribesmen (see Balter's Blog http://michael-balter.blogspot.com/2009/05/vengeance-bites-back-at-jared-diamond.html for a summary). They are asking $10 million in damages. In addition, Diamond has been investigated by Rhonda Roland Shearer, an artist and the widow of Stephen Jay Gould, whose website StinkyJournalism.org (http://www.stinkyjournalism.org/latest-journalism-news-updates-152.php ) criticizes Diamond for bad anthropology and bad journalism. "



You mention above that Diamond "recorded" interviews...I just wanted to let you know: Diamond did NOT record ANY interviews with Daniel Wemp --his single source for his New Yorker article.

Importantly, the article wrongly claims that all the quotations attributed to Daniel Wemp are from 2001-2002 when Daniel drove Diamond around in the Southern Highlands, of Papua New Guinea.

Problem is, not only did Diamond not record these 2001-2002 conversations-- he did not take any notes either. The New Yorker and Diamond admit the only notes he has are from one meeting in May 2006. The quotations, therefore, are backdated (unbeknown to readers) and are from 2006--not 2001-2002.

Diamond's creative license includes not bothering to fact check whether or not people and tribes he named as rapists and killers were, in fact so.

Two examples: Henep Isum, who Diamond said was the leader of Ombal warriors, who was paralyzed in a wheelchair from an arrow in the spine doled out by Daniel Wemp's assassins. Turned out Isum was not even an Ombal but was a Henep tribal member and a local peace officer. The wheelchair and spinal injury are both untrue--proof? We have photos of him walking around.

Famed New Yorker fact checkers and Diamond admit they never even attempted to contact Isum, the Nipa Police or anyone else to confirm if their allegations that Isum was a criminal were true.

The second example: Diamond said the Ombal and Handa tribes were part of the Nipa tribe. He claimed Handas and Ombals along with the Nipa, raped and killed Huli along a highway.

Diamond was dead wrong. The Ombal and Handa are NOT Nipa and when the Nipa attacked Huli and raped their women, Ombals and Handa were not involved in any way. They lived hours away from the highway and the fight in question. Any Huli, Nipa or government officials in the area would have straighten Diamond and The New Yorker out if they had only asked.

We talked to dozens of witnesses including missionaries who live in the area, police, government officials, tribal leaders, an anthropologist who lived in the area...There is simply no excuse for accusing people of crimes without doing any verification.

Would they have called "John Brown" from Norway and his family rapists and murderers without checking? I don't think so.

The tribes and the named individuals are justifiably upset and have a right to justice after being defamed --just like John Brown.



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Artificial Wisdom

Previous entry: The Law of the People, to the People

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376